S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it

Peer_blind_reviewing

Publication ethics and malpractice statement –
«S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it»

 

«S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it» is a peer reviewed international journal committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics.

These guidelines are based on existing Elsevier policies and COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors

1. PUBLICATION AND AUTHORSHIP

Paolo Amodio (Italy) is the Editor-in-Chief of the peer reviewed international journal «S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it». Nevermind Srls (Italy) is the publisher.
«S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it» is an Online Review, free, open access (free of all restrictions on access)

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

Authors need to ensure that the submitted article is the work of the submitting author(s) and is not plagiarized, wholly or in part. They must also make sure that the submitted article is original, is not wholly or in part a re-publication of the author’s earlier work, and contains no fraudulent data.
It is also their responsibility to check that all copyrighted material within the article has permission for publication and that material for which the author does not personally hold copyright is not reproduced without permission.
Finally, authors should ensure that the manuscript submitted is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.

2. AUTHOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES

«S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it» is a peer-reviewed journal, and Authors are obliged to participate in our double blind peer review process.
Authors need to ensure that all data in the submitted article are real and authentic. They must make sure that all authors have significantly contributed to the research submitted in the article, and that all and only the contributors to the article are listed as authors. It is their responsibility to ensure that no participants are harmed, physically or mentally, during the research which results in the article, and that personal details of the participants, where participants have not agreed for such details to be released or where the release of such details could endanger a participant, are fully anonymized. This applies both to textual citations and to images and any supplementary audio or visual material. Authors should also ensure that all authors provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.

3. PEER REVIEW AND REVIEWERS’ RESPONSIBILITIES

Both the Referee and the Author remain anonymous throughout the “double blind” review process. Referees are selected according to their expertise in their particular fields.
Referees have a responsibility to be objective in their judgments; to have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, with respect to the authors and/or with respect to the research funders; to point out relevant published work which is not yet cited by the author(s); and to treat the reviewed articles confidentially.

4. EDITORIAL RESPONSIBILITIES

Editors hold full authority to reject/accept an article; to accept a paper only when reasonably certain; to promote publication of corrections or retractions when errors are found; to preserve anonymity of reviewers; and to have no conflict of interest with respect to articles they reject/accept. If an Editor feels that there is likely to be a perception of a conflict of interest in relation to their handling of a submission, they will declare it to the other Editors. The other Editors will select referees and make all decisions on the paper.

5. PUBLISHING ETHICS ISSUES

Members of the Editorial Board ensure the monitoring and safeguarding of the publishing ethics. This comprises the strict policy on plagiarism and fraudulent data, the strong commitment to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed, and the strict preclusion of business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards.
Whenever it is recognized that a published paper contains a significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distorted report, it will be corrected promptly. If, after an appropriate investigation, an item proves to be fraudulent, it will be retracted. The retraction will be clearly identifiable to readers and indexing systems.


Gli articoli e le recensioni vengono prima vagliati dal Comitato di Redazione che giudica quali meritano attenzione. Il Comitato li sottopone quindi al Direttore che può procedere a un’ulteriore selezione. I testi vengono infine sottoposti a due revisori (scelti tra il Comitato Scientifico o tra studiosi del settore specifico) sotto forma di blind review: in caso di dubbio o di opinioni discordanti, vengono sottoposti ad altri due revisori sempre sotto forma di blind review.
Tranne in casi di piccole questioni (magari di editing, punteggiatura o titolazioni di paragrafi) su cui si interviene direttamente, agli autori degli articoli viene eventualmente chiesto di provvedere ai rilievi indicati e l’articolo viene pubblicato solo se l’autore è disponibile alle modifiche.



 

 

Referees_2017

 

  • ADORNO Francesco Paolo Docente di Bioetica e Filosofia Morale Università degli Studi di Salerno
  • BANON David Professeur au Département d’études hébraïques et juives, Université de Strasbourg; Membre de l’Institut Universitaire de France; Prof. invité au départment de pensée juive, Université hébraïque de Jérusalem
  • BATTAGLIA Fiorella Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Fakultät für Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und ReligionswissenschaftLehrstuhl für Philosophie und politische Theorie
  • BIUSO Giovanni Alberto Docente di Filosofia Teoretica Università degli Studi di Catania
  • CATENA Maria Teresa Docente di Filosofia Teoretica Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  • D’ALESSANDRO Giuseppe Docente di Storia della Filosofia Università degli Studi di Napoli – L’Orientale
  • DI STASO Leonardo Docente di Estetica Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  • DONATELLI Piergiorgio Docente di Filosofia Morale Università di Roma “La Sapienza”
  • DUFLO Colas Docente di Littérature française du XVIIIe siècle (Littérature et philosophie) Université Paris Nanterre
  • FRALDI Massimiliano Docente di Scienza delle costruzioni  Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  • GAGLIASSO Elena Docente di Filosofia e Scienze del vivente  Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”
  • GIAMMUSSO Salvatore Docente di Storia della Filosofia Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  • GIANNINI Gianluca Docente di Filosofia Morale  Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  • KAPLAN Edward K. Kevy and Hortense Kaiserman Professor in the Humanities, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
  • LEVY Neil Deputy Director (Research) of the Oxford Centre for Neuroethics; Head of Neuroethics at the Florey Neuroscience Institutes, University of Melbourne
  • LISSA Anna Maitre de Conférence Littérature juive et hébraïque Département d’Etudes hebraïques Universite Paris-8, France
  • LISSA Giuseppe Professore Emerito di Filosofia Morale  Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  • LUCCI Diego Professor of History and Philosophy, American University in Bulgaria
  • MARCHESINI Roberto Centro Studi Filosofia Postumanista Direttore della Scuola di Interazione Uomo Animale (SIUA) Docente di Scienze Comportamentali Applicate
  • MASSIMILLA Edoardo Docente di Storia della Filosofia Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  • MENSITIERI Giuseppe Docente di Scienza e Tecnologia dei Materiali Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  • MIGLINO Orazio Coordinator of Advanced Learning Technology Research Group Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies (ISTC) – Docente di Teorie e Modelli dello Sviluppo Cognitivo Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  • MORI Maurizio Docente di Bioetica  Università degli Studi di Torino
  • MUSIO Alessio Docente di Filosofia Morale Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milano
  • PAPA Alessandra Docente di Antropologia Filosofica Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milano
  • PAPPARO Felice Ciro Docente di Antropologia Filosofica Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  • PASTORE Lucio Docente di Biochimica Clinica e Biologia Molecolare Clinica Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II – Ricercatore e Consigliere d’amministrazione del CEINGE – Biotecnologie Avanzate Napoli
  • PESSINA Adriano Docente di Bioetica Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milano
  • PICCOLO Davide INFN – Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare – Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR)
  • POLLO Simone Docente di Bioetica Università di Roma “La Sapienza”
  • SALLUZZO Marco National Research Council – SPIN Institute Dipartimento Scienze Fisiche Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant Angelo
  • STADLER Max Professur für Wissenschaftsforchung, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zürich
Print Friendly, PDF & Email